Friday, June 5, 2009

Tacoma Art Museum Submission

Okay, herein follows the image and design description submitted. Wish us luck!

A collaboration with Jonathan Denton

TAcoMa Connects


A Schematic, A Vision - The Connection
We are submitting a photograph of a painting as our sketch. Abstract art provides room for interpretation allowing for individuals to draw meaning from it as they see from their perspective. We are looking at Tacoma as a painting and asking the question what do you see? We believe that if an objective solution to the design problem is arrived at too quickly, that potential stakeholders in the project could be lost. Ideal solutions need the approval and support from direct stakeholders and the projects neighbors. Fundamentally, people are very attracted to opportunities which allow them to express their vision rather than a scenario were you give them little to no input. We have a few images in our mind which we would like to share with you. Hopefully this conversation will continue to generate more vision and support from Tacoma.
We start with the museum and the lower parking level. By installing video and light art in the parking area the issues of way finding and visibility from I-705 are addressed. These forms of art assist in creating life and lend an ephemeral quality to the space. They can also be changed as desired which sets up a scenario for creating a buzz as an “opening” can be held.
Moving up to the plaza and Pacific Avenue visibility is again addressed, as is placemaking. The “shed” transforms from a storage space to a kitchen for a cafĂ© which is moved from inside the museum. Re-programming in this way sets up exciting opportunities such as cladding the piece in a glowing skin to signal “open,” adding a glass enclosure for seating, and a canopy reaching out to Pacific Avenue to provide protection from the elements and adding to the distinct “hello” begun by the kitchen. Installing light landscape and commissioned art pieces continue the sculptural path from the railroad tracks which ties back to the lower parking level.
Permeable pavers and native drought resistant landscape beginning at the railroad tracks, crossing the street, and running through the parking area would tie the parking and plaza areas together and extend fingers beyond the distinct line of the site. The landscaping becomes another layer of way finding and sets a scenario for a sculpture garden. As you walk the path from the tracks to the stairs and elevator a connection back to the context of Tacoma can be created by setting up views to Mt. Rainier, the Tacoma Dome, key downtown buildings etc.
The path would run through the parking lot to the existing elevator and Alan Liddle stairs and continue on to a new elevator and bridge. This piece of the vision would allow for another series of opportunities which crave exploration. The bridge would provide shelter for both the TAM plaza and Tollefson Plaza in addition to providing much needed accessibility and connections between each of the pieces. The proposed elevator and bridge would be the “coup de foudre” (a thunderbolt; love at first sight), finalizing TAM’s desire for a symbol and visibility yet respecting Antoine Predocks’ design. It is the final connection that would generate a significant presence along the Pacific Avenue Corridor and consider the neighborhood holistically.
Hopefully we can find common ground in our vision for the future site improvements of the TAM. We believe that a better solution is found through collaborations with the neighborhood and stakeholders and the multiple perspectives which may be taken from our painting. It would be great to continue the conversation and use this project as an opportunity to better connect Tacoma both objectively and emotionally.

Tacoma Art Museum



I'm not sure how many of you know but the Tacoma Art Museum has released a Request for Proposals for a redesign of the plaza at Pacific Avenue and their parking area. They've a few issues they'd like to have addressed and are requesting a very easy submission for the RFP. Thankfully, they're not requiring you be a licensed Architect and have left the competition open to all. An excellent opportunity for people like me who are starting a design firm, are not licensed but would love the opportunity to give back to their community and get some work in the process (note to self, quit volunteering your time away!).

The submissions are due today by 5:00 p.m.

I've been working with a friend - Jon Denton - on this submission. It's been an interesting experience and I do believe we're both a better for it. I've loaded the image and after 5:00 p.m. will add the design description. It's the first piece of work I'll be putting up and it's very exciting.

Chat soon.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

ChaOs Hyperbole (hye-PER-buh-lee)




I'm making a commitment to update this blog regularly from this point forward. Much of it initially may be about the journey of starting my design firm. Heading out on my own has been sitting in the back of my mind for many years, this economy has provided the impetus. I'm excited and somewhat nervous but I think those are feelings all new business owners experience. You know you can do it, your gut is telling you it's time, it's getting the paying clients that seem to be the hardest part!

For those who don't know, I'll be focusing on set design for the theater, exhibit design, interior design, and furniture design. Once I get my license (the goal is within the next 12 months), I'll venture out in to the world of architecture. Until the point where I can actually call myself and Architect, I must stay with projects under 5,000 square feet.

I'm leaning towards the artistic realm for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, my mind works that way. I'm a concept designer, which means that I don't design just because something "looks good," my designs are based on a unique concept developed from the desires of the client and the context of the project. Decisions are made on how they reinforce that concept. It makes the design process smoother, cleaner and faster. Secondly it's because of the inspiration of the incredible artists I've had the opportunity to meet over the years and the belief in their craft. So many have the same attitude I have - nothing is impossible, you need only figure out how to do it. You ply your craft because you believe in the value it can bring to others who experience it.

Which brings me to the name of my design firm. Why ChaOs Hyperbole? Doesn't that seem like it might scare people off? Make them think the process or the product is going to be chaotic? What I'm actually saying with the name of the firm and trying to reinforce via the logo (an early version of it sits here with the post) is that life is chaotic, the built environment is chaotic, but it's a controlled chaos which should be embraced. The hyperbole is also a reinforcement that "chaos" is often an exaggeration, which is a fun play on the theme as a whole.

So I hope to keep you informed on this journey of starting a design firm and perhaps we can grow our aesthetics and experiences together.

If you'd like to stay posted please subscribe or follow me on Twitter @CarolineOLeary where I'll let you know when I update the blog.

Ciao